The images from the Kenyatta International Convention Centre (KICC) on March 7 will be etched in Kenya’s political memory: President William Ruto and opposition leader Raila Odinga — bitter rivals in last year’s bruising contests — seated side by side, pens in hand, signing a document billed as the foundation of a new national consensus.
The Memorandum of Understanding (MoU), born out of months of tense dialogue, is the culmination of the National Dialogue Committee (NADCO) process. It enshrines a 10-point agenda ranging from electoral justice to economic reform, institutional accountability, inclusivity in governance, and a binding mechanism for future dispute resolution.
For a country accustomed to cyclical post-election unrest, the pact is being sold as a reset button for Kenya’s democracy. But can it survive Kenya’s notoriously treacherous political terrain?
How We Got Here
The roots of the MoU lie in the tumult of 2023–2024, when Raila’s Azimio coalition staged months of street protests over the cost of living and alleged electoral malpractice. Running battles between police and demonstrators left dozens dead and the economy reeling.
Ruto, buoyed by his razor-thin electoral win, initially dismissed dialogue, insisting government would proceed with its agenda. But the specter of instability, coupled with pressure from civil society, clergy, and international partners, forced both camps to the negotiating table.
By late 2024, the National Dialogue Committee had hammered out recommendations, but the missing piece was a framework to implement them. That gap is what the March 7 MoU seeks to fill.
What’s in the Deal
At its core, the MoU lays out 10 areas of reform:
1. Electoral Justice: Comprehensive review of the IEBC, from appointment of commissioners to technology use.
2. Cost of Living: Targeted subsidies, anti-cartel crackdowns, and new safety nets for vulnerable families.
3. Public Debt Management: Caps on borrowing and mandatory parliamentary oversight.
4. Inclusivity in Governance: Fair representation of women, youth, and marginalized groups.
5. Judicial Independence: Increased funding and insulation from political interference.
6. Corruption & Accountability: Empowered watchdogs with prosecutorial teeth.
7. Devolution Safeguards: Timely county disbursements, expanded county mandates.
8. Parliamentary Reform: Review of Standing Orders to allow bipartisan checks.
9. Truce Mechanism: Binding arbitration panel for future disputes.
10. Quarterly Progress Reports: Public scorecards to track delivery.
Winners and Losers
Ruto’s Calculus
For President Ruto, the pact offers breathing room. With the economy struggling, debt mounting, and public patience thinning, the truce could ease political pressure and restore investor confidence. By projecting statesmanship, Ruto also seeks to control the narrative of unity before the 2027 polls.
Raila’s Leverage
For Raila, the deal cements his relevance after multiple electoral defeats. By framing the MoU as a people’s victory, he retains grassroots legitimacy while securing concessions that his supporters can rally around. Cynics, however, see shades of the 2008 and 2018 “handshake” politics, which critics say benefitted elites more than ordinary Kenyans.
Other Players
Civil society groups cautiously welcomed the roadmap but warned that “without iron-clad timelines, this could be another photo-op.” Opposition hardliners fear Raila has been co-opted, while Ruto’s allies privately grumble that concessions undermine the president’s hardline reformist brand.
The Risks Ahead
The MoU is ambitious, but execution remains the Achilles heel. Kenya’s history is littered with elite pacts that collapsed under political expediency. Skeptics point to the 2018 Handshake between Raila and Uhuru Kenyatta, which birthed the ill-fated BBI initiative, as a cautionary tale.
Already, fault lines are emerging. Disagreements over IEBC reforms and the question of who pays for subsidies could quickly unravel the consensus. Meanwhile, hardline voices in both UDA and Azimio remain unconvinced.
As political analyst Dr. Rose Akinyi notes: “This pact buys calm, not permanent peace. Its survival depends on whether both leaders are willing to subordinate their 2027 ambitions to Kenya’s stability — and that’s a tall order.”
The Bigger Picture
For now, the optics of the KICC handshake project rare hope. Two men whose rivalry has defined Kenyan politics for nearly two decades appear to have found common ground. Whether the MoU becomes a genuine covenant for reform or a temporary ceasefire of convenience will determine Kenya’s democratic trajectory.
This week there’s talk of revival of the NADCO Report.
As Kenyans exhaled after the ceremony, one question lingered: Will history remember March 7, 2025, as the day Kenya turned the corner — or just another page in its endless cycle of elite bargains?
Leave a Reply